Gnashvar wrote:Rurouni_Fencer wrote:Every time Nintendo announces a new system, or (___insert Nintendo franchise here___) game, it's met with incredible skepticism. And yet, every time, it manages to re-invent itself and sell ass-loads of units to fan-boys and naysayers alike. 2012 will be no different.
I'm just gonna go ahead and start saving money now..
Agree. Everyone is always saying this or that about Nintendo. But in the end just like the famous online meme... "It prints money"
I keep hearing this general sentiment about Nintendo consoles, but really, hasn't this only happened twice? With the DS and the Wii (and, to a lesser extent, the Wii Fit)? Nothing else they've done was really met with anymore skepticism than any other console, and earlier "questionable" console directions, the 64 and Gamecube, didn't make the market impact that Nintendo had expected. As far as franchises, questionable directions don't seem to be that common, nor are they always met with universal praise: you have the successful Super Mario Galaxy alongside a Super Mario Sunshine that was met with a mixed response -- you could make the same comparison when it comes to Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker and Legend of Zelda: Spirit Tracks. Outside of that, it seems identical to the Apple "culture" going around... there's a group that goes way overboard in trying to stir up controversy and ridicule over their products, and another group that totally blows their favored company's innovations out of proportion.
And I mean let's be frank, despite sales figures, how great are most of Nintendo's ideas in actual practice? Wii Fit sold by the boatload, but it's really a pretty lousy device for anyone who has even a remotely vested interest in games. How many times have you complained that the touch-screen or motion-control features on a DS or Wii game feel forced, out of place, or just plain wonky? Were those efforts
really a success in any way that's actually meaningful to you as a gamer outside of a handful of games? Nintendo has had their successes, but I can't help but cringe everytime I hear them referred to as the maverick gamblers, proving the nay-sayers wrong with their totally wacky, innovative approach to blah blah blah just because they've managed to
recycle ideas and market them successfully -- it's not like you have to get all that kooky to be more interesting than Sony and Microsoft. And to get to what I feel is the crux of the matter, why are gamers so quick to point out Nintendo's financial successes as some kind of vindication of their efforts? -- You're
gamers, not market analysts. Who cares if the Wii Fit conquered the odds and sold a jillion units if it's not even marketed towards you? How is that in any way a success for
you?