AppleQueso wrote:This is infuriating. Don't these companies realize that something like 40 percent of the population still hasn't upgraded to HD?
OK I admit it..I totally looked up that statistic because I half wanted to be snotty and half couldn't believe that SD penetration was still so high. (Most major electronics outlets haven't even sold SD TVs for almost 10 years now!) However, according to Neilsen's most recent
report, 44% of homes in the US do not have an HD set. Incredible.
When it comes to the 360 & PS3 specifically, they are intended to be HD consoles, even if they cheekily include composite cables in the box. Just about every game for those consoles is developed with HD in mind. A few notables (Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts comes to mind) actually issued post-release patches to improve readability on SD sets due to complaints. I'm of two minds here -- if you can afford a 360 or PS3, chances are you can afford an HDTV, many of which are cheaper than the consoles themselves. I mean really, why would you be buying an HD console for use on an SD TV? It doesn't make a lot of logical sense. On the other hand, because they include composite cables, it seems that they are saying you can play on a SD set (albeit with degraded quality). In my opinion, they should wipe out the composite option, and only output component or HDMI, If you truly want to be an HD console, be HD! Don't pretend your console can function on SD when the reality is that many games suffer for it.
Frankly, SD is dead -- we know it simply in terms of the hardware we can buy. It's all LCD monitors and LCD televisions. How long realistically are game developers required to support legacy formats? They are now providing entertainment for a new technology medium after all.
I suppose for those that insist on keeping their SD set in service..there's always the Wii.
