Might as well make one; Cloverfield Thread.

Post by **Mozgus** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:08 pm

aaron wrote:
lordofduct wrote:
mason wrote:your a pretty angry and negative person lordofduct. anyways in the movie I am legend, those things are vampires. and the kicker is that they consider will smith to be a monster. get it? They live their own little lives, own civizliation just like human beings. And during the only time they are vurnerable aka sleeping during the day the monster comes out and steals their blood.
??

ok...
haha i lol'd pretty hard at this

What the.... Yeah, uh mason. He didn't have a problem with the movie itself. Read what you reply to, plskthxbai.

Post by **racketboy** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:08 pm

Can I get a spoiler-free statement that says if I should pay money to see it in the theatre?

Post by **Adderall** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:13 pm

The movie would NOT be nearly as good if you saw it somewhere else. So I would say that *IF* you decide to go see it, you should see it at the theaters. It is also worth mentioning that this movie isn't one of the best movies ever.... so by not seeing it, you shouldn't feel bad. How's that for sentence structure.

I thought it was pretty cool though, overall, so I would recommend it. Some people (IMO) are reading to far into the validity of the plot. Sometimes it's fun to just sit back and enjoy a flick for what it is.

Post by **Mozgus** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:49 pm

racketboy wrote:Can I get a spoiler-free statement that says if I should pay money to see it in the theatre?

Duct hates me for this, but I only pay $4 to see movies as long as it's before 6pm. Theaters aren't doing so well in Kansas, so I'm taking advantage of the crazy low ticket prices lately. Considering that price, it was totally worth it. And it should not be seen at home unless you have a great setup. Again there isn't much story here. What the movie does offer in spades, is probably not what your home setup will accept.

Post by **mason** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:42 pm

who cares, it wasn't important just a joke. but anyways cloverfield looks lame thats why i didnt go see it.

Post by **lordofduct** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:03 pm

mason wrote:who cares, it wasn't important just a joke. but anyways cloverfield looks lame thats why i didnt go see it.

I figured that.

Post by **Funk, E** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:03 pm

Spoiler-free for Racketboy:

I totally dug it. See it on a big screen if you can, even though the shaky-can can be sick-inducing at time. It's an intense, intense movie--intellectually it's probably not terribly good, but it's certainly viscerally entertaining if one can stop being a postmodern I'm-too-cool-to-like-anything douchebag for an hour and a half to just sit back and enjoy it.

Post by **gradualmeltdown** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:02 am

I enjoyed this movie as well. Its really fun and its short like it should be. See it in the theatre for the sound alone. It won't change your world but its fun!

Post by **Funk, E** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:55 pm

Yeah, the sound design in Cloverfield is fan-fucking-tastic.

Post by **aaron** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:40 pm

still want to see this more than like 90% of other movies that are out or coming out.