What we are talking about here is not multiplayer. We're talking about basic functions that both systems have for free. The 360 can download demos, download updates for free, so can the PS3. Comparing the same basic level of service, ignoring multiplay (again, this not what this argument is about) the PS3 is leagues behind the 360.the7k wrote:As soon as Silver Members can play games online, then you can consider Xbox Live free. Until that day, Xbox Live will continue to be pay-to-play. Silver isn't an option, it's an insult.LoneCynic wrote:Here is the thing I hear the most about the Playstation Network, "The Playstation Network is FREE!" When comparing it to Xbox Live, which is also free, for Silver Members, and paid for Gold members.
360 average wait times*:
Demos: For an average 1.4GB demo it takes roughly half an hour on my connection
Patches: Seconds
Dashboard updates: Minutes, including install
Mandatory game installs: N/A
Overall time to complete all the above: 45m
PS3 average wait times*
Demos: At least a couple of hours for a 1.4GB demo, then 20-30 minutes for it to install
Patches: Depending on the size about 20-30 mins including installation
System Updates: 30-60 minutes to download, another 20-30 minutes to install
Mandatory game install: 20-30 minutes
Overall time to complete all the above: 2hr50m Minimum
There is something fundamentally wrong with the PSN, and something fundamentally wrong with the people who claim the PSN is far superior to Xbox Live. For Xbox Live Silver members it just isn't, it's not even in the same league. Yes, it sucks that Xbox Live Gold isn't free, but if you know where to look you can get it for as little as £2 a month. Considering the amount of time the 360 saves me over my PS3, my time is worth way more than £2 a month... Plus the games are cheaper on the 360, so I'm a winner all round, the amount of money difference it would cost me to get the same game on the PS3, it could go towards paying for the Live membership.
*based on my experience