Ok, well that's about the response I expected. Look. I get it, sincerely. But taxing Romney or any other rich person more isn't going to put more money in your pocket. You think the government is going to appropriate those funds to give you a break or a kick back? Please.
You are only going to pour more money into the government for them to manage poorly. I'm not saying that you should be taxed at 30%, I'm saying that worrying about what other people are being taxed solves nothing.
Also, just an observation, as a history teacher with a minor in political science, you seemed to describe the redistribution of wealth by taxing the rich quite well. All the while saying that is not the intended purpose. Just saying.
In any case, if you missed the part where I mentioned that I am a tax paying middle class democrat, and that I could understand where you were coming from quite well...it's there too, in the same paragraph you selectively responded to.
Bill Gates could afford to be taxed 99% and still live a wonderful life, do you think he shouldn't have the money he earned? Why not? If all you propose is that you are taxed at the same rate, then I hear you. If you propose that a person should be taxed on what they can afford to lose, well my friend, you are in the wrong country.
If you and I are bringing dinner to the table and I provide the meat and potatoes while you bring the bread. I'm not sure you should concern yourself with how much money I have left in my pocket. Fair wages and less outsourcing would be a better thing to focus on, again IMHO.
But, what do I know? I'm not a history teacher.