Europe (at least west of Poland, Hungary) seems poised to become more mixed as time goes by. Migration and declining native births will make this an inevitability, unless Nazis make a comeback since nothing is ruled out for the old continent. I guess the racists will have to get used to it. Integrating mideastern people is generally a lot harder than other nationalities, that much has proven true.
I was labelled a sexist pig several pages back, but this is the sort of bullshit that I talked about that I wouldn't want happening to any woman. That percentage is alarming and is indicative that rather than fighting men's hormones, it's better just to segregate in high-tension professions. A not-insignificant percentage of men will always remain assholes and act out their testosterone.
Another thing that irks me is the welfare state encouraging the single-mom phenomenon. So rather than being wise in choosing partners, women just give birth and have the state deliver the food stamps. This encourages irresponsibility and fatherless parenting, and last I check we are still a few steps up the ape evolutionary ladder. Look at northern European states and their extravagantly disproportionate rape cases perpetrated by migrants descending from sexually-repressed regions. Those victimised women have no strong men in their lives to defend them, because sure as hell if you let your women be sexually assaulted you're worse than the sleaziest wittol. Maybe that's old-fashioned but it's what I believe, regardless of how many liberal arts courses I've attended
"Practically impossible to get out of a phone contract but relatively easy to get out of a marriage" I'll be sure to remember this contradiction whenever I get into an argument with one of the "cool" kids
"Practically impossible to get out of a phone contract but relatively easy to get out of a marriage" I'll be sure to remember this contradiction whenever I get into an argument with one of the "cool" kids
Exactly, we need no-fault phone cancellation.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
So Putin started bombing Syria. Woe are the civvies.. Russkies go boom boom boom, collateral damage be damned and all that.
Supposedly the Russians are unofficially supporting Assad. The whole situation in Syria is lose-lose, but I think Assad resuming control of the country will be better than what's going on right now.
At least Assad didn't send Europe hundreds of thousands of "refugees," and he only killed his own people, unlike ISIS.
prfsnl_gmr wrote:There is nothing feigned about it. What I wrote is a display of actual moral superiority.
The sad truth we must consider is that certain regions of the world can only be controlled by an iron-fisted dictator. I know that's a tough pill to swallow because it runs counter to what we have been taught. In North America and Western Europe we have stable, just, lawful (albeit imperfect) democracies. It is natural to assume that similar forms of government can work anywhere in the world... If only we high-minded eurocentric angels take it upon ourselves to overthrow a few nasty dictators.
We don't stop to consider that dictators like Assad, Gaddafi, Mubarak, and Hussein might have been a necessary evil. Make no mistake; they are certainly evil, but they also have the strength to stabilize otherwise unstable nations. With the local dictator deposed, the local tribes pick up generations-old blood feuds and start to slaughter one another all over again.
Perhaps it's time we finally stop interfering with middle-eastern, African, and Antolian affairs. At least we should reconsider sending military "aid" to countries that do not benefit from it. We are bringing home a generation of war-torn soldiers and breeding a generation of international terrorists whose families were killed in the name of democracy.